Bond sale saves city $14.6 million
by Rick Lemyre
Oct 16, 2009 | 501 views | 11 11 comments | 14 14 recommendations | email to a friend | print
An artist’s rendering of the new Brentwood civic center, which received final approval Tuesday. Construction is set to begin next month.
An artist’s rendering of the new Brentwood civic center, which received final approval Tuesday. Construction is set to begin next month.
slideshow
The City of Brentwood’s sale of bonds for the construction of the new Civic Center was completed this week at an interest rate of 4.97 percent, resulting in a savings of $14.6 million off original budget estimates.

“This has been a very long roller coaster ride,” City Manager Donna Landeros said in an e-mail message. “It is thrilling to see all of the pieces come together better than we ever imagined. The City’s conservative financial policies made it happen! Now let’s get to work and get it built!”

The following memo providing details of the bonding process was sent to the City Council by the city's Finance Dept. Thursday evening:

“The pricing and sale of the 2009 Civic Center Lease Revenue Bonds has been substantially completed. The past few days have been extremely intense as the complexity of our deal along with a rapidly changing financing market caused us more than a few uncomfortable moments. Several large issues were pulled from the market yesterday as some of the planned bond issuances faced increases upwards of 25 basis points (0.25%). This is due to the fact that most bond issues are indexed to the 30 Year Treasury Bond, which after falling for 3 straight months, reversed course and started heading upward.

“We had planned on issuing Build American Bonds (BABS) in order to take advantage of the Federal Subsidy associated with that program. BABS are issued as taxable bonds, with the Federal Government rebating the City 35% of the interest costs. Since BABS investors are typically different than the non-BABS investors, had we not generated enough buyers of our bonds, it would have necessitated our issuing tax-exempt bonds, costing the City approximately 35 basis points (0.35%). By the end of the day we had placed approximately 50% of the bonds, with the knowledge that we had an interested buyer who was likely to pick up a substantial portion of the bonds the following morning.

“This morning began with the news that the 30 year treasury was heading higher again, followed by a phone call from our underwriter who informed us that the buyer wanted to have a phone conference with the City before committing to the deal. We completed the phone conference and within an hour the buyer agreed to purchase $10 million of our bonds. After that, the 30 Year Treasury began to finally weaken, and things fell into place. The rest of the bonds were sold, and we will receive an interest rate of approximately 4.97%. This is the lowest yield the City has ever received on any bond issuance, which is all the more remarkable considering we were unable to insure the bonds due to the collapse of the bond insurers last year. This interest rate is 100 basis points lower than the interest rate we had budgeted. Obviously, that will result in a significant savings for the City. Due to the complexity of the transaction we have not yet been given final numbers and final debt service schedules, but at this point it looks to be a savings of approximately $14.6 million over the life of the issuance.”

Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
To Meds
|
October 21, 2009
To the last poster, it's not appropriate behavior to attack fellow posters, it's called trolling or flaming.

I believe the poster's comment was the number of people in town voting in the last mayoral election was 1/3.

Total Brentwood residents: 51,908

Total votes for the mayoral race in the last election: 18,988

% Brentwood residents voting in last mayoral election for all mayoral candidates: 36%

Your point was that voter turnout was 75%

Brentwood registered voters: 24,061

Registered voters voted in mayoral election for both candidates, Wooten and Taylor, and write-ins: 18,988, or 79%

So, you're both right. The difference in the numbers is that only 46% of Brentwood residents are registered to vote.

I think the mayor and two councilmen need to perk up and take note as a controversial issue like a recall election could certainly galvanize people to get out and vote.
You're off your meds
|
October 21, 2009
Chirpin,what planet do you live on? The voter turnout was more like 75% in that election.

The voter's have already spoken, and they do not like the snake oil you and your cronies are selling!
Chirpin in
|
October 20, 2009
We can not afford to wait the three years left on the mayor's term which was just voted to four years.A recall will be the best way to get people to vote in Brentwood maybe actually get more than the 1/3 of the town who did vote at the last election to go to the polls...THEY HAVE TO BE STOPPED NOW!!!
Great Idea
|
October 20, 2009
How do we go about getting an election to terminate these special tax assessments?

This would certainly help many families keep their homes.

How can we get this started?
anonymous
|
October 20, 2009
Special Tax Assessment Areas can be terminated by a majority vote of the property owners within the special assessed area.

That would be more affective than attempting a recall that merely pitts all citizens against each other.

Recalls are a very bad idea, just do not vote them back in. The negative fallout from a recall will be long lasting far after the recall vote no matter which way the vote ends.
sure thing
|
October 20, 2009
gotta love the spin, "we have not been given final numbers" but the City and the Press exclaim they've saved $14.6 million
Stopthetax
|
October 18, 2009
Existing CFD/ CIFD TAXES that HOMEOWNERS and BUSINESS OWNERS pay, which if the City wanted to help stop foreclosures or save local businesses, they could suspend (not collect) these special tax assessments until the economy recovers.

That is if the City could break its addiction to taxing its citizens to the maximum extent possible! It's time to put them on a diet and reduce taxes to save local homes and jobs!

Rollback your taxes, Recall BECNEL, BROCKMAN, & TAYLOR
over and over
|
October 17, 2009
It's been said repeatedly, so I doubt saying it again will make any difference, but here goes anyway: The bonds will be paid for with existing revenue, not new taxes. Also, City Park is not going away, it will be bigger than it is today. Also, the sewer lines someone said (another thread) should be replaced instead of spending money on these downtown projects are being replaced as part of these downtown projects.
leftfoot
|
October 17, 2009
How much
|
October 17, 2009
The only thing that matters is how much are our TAXES are going to be raised.Now that the tax base is shrinking everyday.Don't forget your money already spent on a new garbage dump and a water treatment plant.Why won't they tell us how much are taxes will be raised? A recall is the best way to stop this....
total Cost
|
October 16, 2009
And what is the total cost of the bonds to the city by the time all the money is paid back to the bondholders?
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the discretion of thepress.net.