City mulls Prewett Park improvements
by Justin Lafferty
Jul 13, 2011 | 1755 views | 1 1 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Kids enjoy the water slide Tuesday at the Prewitt Water Park. Antioch officials are trying to decide how to spend $2 million in savings from the construction of the Antioch Community Center.<br><i>Photo by Richard Wisdom</i>
Kids enjoy the water slide Tuesday at the Prewitt Water Park. Antioch officials are trying to decide how to spend $2 million in savings from the construction of the Antioch Community Center.
Photo by Richard Wisdom
slideshow
Antioch officials Monday brainstormed how to spend roughly $2 million in special tax money earmarked for Prewett Park, but must clear several hurdles first.

Members of the public and the city’s Mello Roos District Board offered ideas such as a synthetic turf soccer or disc golf field, better Wi-Fi coverage in the Antioch Community Center or simply paying off a portion of the Mello Roos bonds, which are special property taxes that help subsidize schools and public services. The current Mello Roos bonds are due to expire in 2016.

However, as consultant and former Prewett Park project manager, Lonnie Karste pointed out at Monday’s Mello Roos District Board meeting, $2 million won’t stretch very far. The money – savings from the construction of the Antioch Community Center – must also account for parking, grading or soil improvements in the hilly area near the water park and new facility. As the area is home to burrowing owls, the city would also need to take into account environmental mitigation.

“All of those things are possible; all of those things would have to be reviewed,” Karste said. “Unfortunately, you have $2 million, so you have sort of a fixed amount of money from the city’s perspective.”

Antioch’s Mello Roos District does not decide how to spend these funds, but offers recommendations to the city. Board members opted not to provide an official opinion to the city on Monday, but rather to pass along their thoughts and public comment.

Though no decision was submitted to the city, board members Terry Ramus, Walter Ruehlig and Wade Harper generally agreed that the $2 million could cover a new turf field. And since traveling sports teams would rent out the field and spend money locally, the project could generate revenue for the city. Board member Thomas McNell, who was away on a business trip, submitted a written statement supporting a turf field.

“I’m looking at the youth, and to refute that statement that there’s nothing to do in the city of Antioch,” Harper said. “But at the same time, if we can’t afford it, if it comes out to be too much, we should have a Plan B in place.”

In contrast, board member Larry Osorio felt that another field would be one too many and siphon off traffic from other fields in the city. He abstained from voting on the matter, citing concern that the city wouldn’t be able to build the field soon enough for it to be cost-efficient.

Ruehlig noted that while he’s not sure how much the environmental mitigation or grading would cost, the synthetic turf field could eat up roughly $1.5 million.

Some residents who spoke at Monday’s meeting felt that instead of trying to force something to happen with the $2 million, the Mello Roos District should recommend that the city use it to help pay off the bonds, easing the strain on taxpayers.

That option also found support in an online poll conducted by former City Councilman Allen Payton. Of the 248 votes in the poll, 90 were in favor of giving it back.

“I talked to a few people in my neighborhood, and they’re all Mello Roos taxpayers, and their first response was, ‘Why not give the money back so that it gets paid down sooner?’” Antioch resident Trisha Meirle told the board. “I really think that people deserve a break after paying all these years and for all that they have paid.”

But Ramus noted that using the $2 million in that fashion really wouldn’t be as effective as it sounds. While it seems like a large sum of cash now, it would equal a savings of only $133 per Mello Roos taxpayer, essentially meaning that the bond would be paid off a scant 32 days earlier. Other board members felt, however, that such a use of the funds is an option the city should take seriously.

Antioch’s City Council will decide how to spend the money at a future meeting.
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
LifeRing
|
July 14, 2011
Synthetic turf fields in the good ol summer time in the Antioch sun, great. Heat on the field could exceed 150deg F. Ok, we could cool it off with water misters. oh wait a minute that would become a perfect petri dish to grow bacteria an fungi. Well then we could disinfect and vacuum the surface on regular ongoing basis. All that doesn’t seam too expensive now does it.

'Given the relatively recent development of new-generation synthetic turf, there are unanswered questions regarding its potential effects on health and the environment, with the rubber infill one of the main sources of concern. The crumbs become airborne and can be breathed in and tracked into homes on clothes and athletic gear. There are also questions about dermal and ingestional exposures, and about ecosystem effects.

For athletes, the little black rubber pellets may seem little more than a nuisance. Others express more concern, especially when it comes to children’s exposure to the infill. Patti Wood, executive director of the nonprofit Grassroots Environmental Education, argues, “This crumb rubber is a material that cannot be legally disposed of in landfills or ocean-dumped because of its toxicity. Why on earth should we let our children play on it?”

Take look at these:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/28/nyregion/nyregionspecial2/28turfwe.html

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-05-17-turf-carcinogens_N.htm

http://ehp03.niehs.nih.gov/article/fetchArticle.action?articleURI=info:doi/10.1289/ehp.116-a116

Bob...

Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the discretion of thepress.net.