Oakley gets green light for power plant – again
Dec 21, 2012 | 1430 views | 2 2 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Oakley City Council members, from left, then-Vice Mayor Kevin Romick, Carol Rios, Mayor Jim Frazier, Pat Anderson and Randy Pope made their mark at the Oakley Generating Station groundbreaking ceremony in 2011.
Oakley City Council members, from left, then-Vice Mayor Kevin Romick, Carol Rios, Mayor Jim Frazier, Pat Anderson and Randy Pope made their mark at the Oakley Generating Station groundbreaking ceremony in 2011.
slideshow


In what appears to be the final word, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has given the go-ahead for the construction of a natural-gas-fired generating station in Oakley.

“The CPUC approval is very good news for Oakley,” said City Manager Bryan Montgomery. “… It will certainly have a positive economic impact.”

The authorization of the plant – to be located on 22-acres on Bridgehead Road near the Antioch bridge – comes after years of approvals and appeals for the PG&E power plant, the latest denial handed down in March by the California Court of Appeal in San Francisco when they cited that the CPUC neglected to allow enough time for public comment during a previous appeal process in 2010.

“This apparent attempt to minimize public input lends further credence to TURN’s (The Utility Reform Network) contention that the Commission had become so enamored of the project, it was willing to dispense with the procedural safeguards established by its rules and the statutes in order to achieve its preferred outcome,” the court ruling read.

Now, PG&E has been given the green light to purchase the 586-megawatt power Oakley Generating Station, which is expected to go online in July 2016. Danville-based Radback Energy, Inc., will build the facility, which had its groundbreaking last summer, and sell it back to PG&E once the plant is operating.

According to Montgomery, the plant will mean approximately $6 million in funding from Radback via a community grant program earmarked for local nonprofit organizations and city capital improvement projects.

“When the project is funded and financed the Community Benefits Agreement with the city kicks in,” said Montgomery. “Which means about $3 million as an initial payment to the City for some capital projects and it has been estimated that during construction, another $3 million in one-time sales tax revenues will also come to the City.”

The project is expected to bring some 700-plus union jobs to town, with an estimated $2.5 million in annual tax revenues for the city.

According to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District website, the proposed project is a combined-cycle power plant that uses a state-of-the-art design for fast startups. It would consist of two gas turbines, two heat-recovery steam generators, and one steam turbine, with associated equipment including an air-cooled condenser, a natural gas-fired auxiliary boiler, a 3-cell evaporative fluid cooler, a diesel-engine driven fire pump, and an oil-water separator. The proposed facility would also provide energy-efficient electric generation using new technology, with operational flexibility to efficiently address grid fluctuations due to the intermittent nature of renewable power sources, such as wind and solar.

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
FreedomTeacher
|
December 27, 2012
Some would say the public has been "informed", but that's about as accurate as saying BP was a hero in the Gulf of Mexico. The serious lack of education in our community has never been more blatantly evident. People are so excited about 700 jobs (reasonably so) and eyes glaze over when millions of dollars are being waved in front of them. Let's not be distracted by what the other hand is brushing under the table. Natural Gas is being sold as "clean coal", but don't be fooled. It still releases toxic gases into our air (most of us live down-wind), and the process of drilling for it is contaminating our groundwater. Fracking anyone? This is a very sad defeat for our health and the environment, but nobody seems to care. I've written letters and spoken at City Hall, but the reports boldly state that there is NO public opposition. Once again, our so-called democracy is played like a puppet by corporations with all the money. If we really need the money, how about using Mt. Diablo as a nuclear waste burial site?
FreedomTeacher
|
December 27, 2012
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/24/california-fracking_n_2360902.html
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the discretion of thepress.net.