Recall group ousted from Safeway
by Ruth Roberts
Feb 02, 2012 | 1956 views | 11 11 comments | 24 24 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Sheriff’s deputies were called to remove recall proponents from the Safeway parking lot Saturday after store officials said they had received complaints of harassment.
Sheriff’s deputies were called to remove recall proponents from the Safeway parking lot Saturday after store officials said they had received complaints of harassment.
slideshow
Tensions between dueling factions escalated last weekend as supporters of the effort to recall CSD Director Brian Dawson were evicted from the Discovery Bay Safeway parking lot.

“We did call the police and they handed a trespass notice to the solicitor and they were instructed to leave,” said Susan Houghton, director of public relations for Safeway. “I had personally sent an e-mail on Friday (Jan. 27) to Mr. (Don) Flint, and our legal team and legal counsel did as well. Mr. Flint’s response was that he disagreed.”

A pair of Sherrif’s deputies responded to the call, and the petitioners left peacefully.

The recall attempt began in October following charges filed against Dawson in August for spousal battery and child endangerment. To date, Dawson has refused calls to step down from his seat on the town board.

On Saturday, Jan. 28, petitioners set up a tent in the Safeway parking lot to collect signatures for the recall effort, which has until Monday (Feb. 6) to collect 1,649 signatures to be put on the June ballot. Although they had been at the town center previous weekends – and had been granted corporate permission to be there – according to Safeway officials, the company’s policies had changed over the summer, and some store managers had not been made aware of the new guidelines.

“Safeway’s solicitation policy has changed but some of our stores are still struggling with what’s considered acceptable,” said Houghton. “Petitioners are never acceptable, whether it’s for the legalization of marijuana, the Amazon tax or a recall. … The Brownies, food banks and the Salvation Army are things that we have been told are important to our customers, and in this case, exactly because of what happened this weekend is the reason we don’t want to be in the middle of it. The recall issue has nothing to do with Safeway.”

Houghton said that “repeated complaints” from customers of harassment by petitioners led the local store manager to contact corporate headquarters, where the violation of the solicitation policy was discovered.

Recall organizer Don Flint said he supported Safeway’s right to implement whatever policies it wished, and places the blame for his group’s eviction squarely at the feet of Dawson supporters, whom he believes were responsible for contacting Safeway officials.

“I think their methods are pathetic, but it does show that Dawson knows how strong the community support for the recall is,” said Flint. “Dawson understands that his only chance to stay on the board is to make it much more difficult for people to sign the petition.”

The Safeway incident is the latest in a series of volatile events involving the two camps. Allegations of harassment on both sides and charges of election code violations have intensified an already contentious situation in recent weeks.

Dawson believes last weekend’s incident is one more example of the group’s determination to defy the law. It does, however, prompt him to consider whether or not to resign.

“This is just another example of the recall proponents violating the law while talking about character and integrity,” said Dawson. “The constant lying and intimidation of my family does make me think about stepping down, but what would that say to future leaders if I were to step down because of intimidation and unlawful antics?”

Flint said the Safeway incident might hurt the effort of the petitioners, but he declined to say how many signatures had been gathered so far.

“Dawson’s gang chasing us out of public forums will make it very difficult to get enough signatures – that’s why they do it,” said Flint. “But we’ll keep at it.”
Comments
(11)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
todbresident
|
February 04, 2012
Just heard that the "recall proponents" who were already ousted from in front of Safeway TWICE were back again this morning, and also at Starbucks. Then later today they'll be by the Steakhouse and Boardwalk Grill. This is ridiculous. The sheriff's office needs to get a handle on this, as do these businesses because people want to shop and dine without being hassled. The crazy thing is that people who are hassled have no interest in signing a petition, especially the day before SuperBowl Sunday. We all have so much to do today. My dollars are going to Fresh & Easy and WinCo. No interest in going to Safeway.
MillieP
|
February 04, 2012
Gee Wiz todb Dave,Bob, and Brian

Are you afraid that Brian will get recalled?

Grow up and let the process takes its course.

"I'm tellin" Wah Wah Wah

It will be a pleasure and relief not to see your cry baby face at Safeway todb. Wah Wah
Tim_Haverson
|
February 04, 2012
Really mature comment, MillieP.
todbresident
|
February 03, 2012
Um, hello?? Don your letter is ridiculous. As was clearly stated in the article above AND pointed out by whose_fault below:

“We did call the police and they handed a trespass notice to the solicitor and they were instructed to leave,” said Susan Houghton, director of public relations for Safeway. “I had personally sent an e-mail on Friday (Jan. 27) to Mr. (Don) Flint, and our legal team and legal counsel did as well. Mr. Flint’s response was that he disagreed.”

So Don, now you're calling Safeway's Director of Public Relations a liar?? And you're also saying that the Press didn't investigate the situation correctly, reporting the facts inaccurately?? (Ergo, the Press is lying too??) And on top of that, you have the audacity to conclude that the community has demonstrated strong support for the recall? How about you man-up and tell everyone how many signatures you have? And we can then compare that to the number of actual residents who live in Discovery Bay so that we can all gauge just how strong the support is for the recall. The fact that you weren't willing to share that info with the Press AND the fact that you went to the trouble of pitching a tent in the Safeway lot to get attention makes it clear how little support you have, and how desperate - and how personally invested - in this ridiculous effort to waste our community's time and money. And THAT is the real point of the article in the Press.

Don_Flint
|
February 02, 2012
First, a couple of facts:

1) The recall proponents did not trespass;

2) The police never gave the recall proponents a trespass notice.

Brian Dawson, Bob Mankin and David Piepho have put forth a good deal of effort in convincing people otherwise but the facts are clear.

Any doubts? Listen to the meeting audio when the Sheriff's officer responds to David Piepho's assertion that there was trespassing: http://www.todb.ca.gov/images/02.01.12_TODB.MP3

(Skip to the 17 minute mark)

When the Sheriff's officer assured the gathering that there was no trespass at all, David Piepho rebutted the comment by saying that was not what he had been told by Safeway personnel. Sorry David, Brian and Bob, just because you want to say we broke the law doesn't mean we did.

And because of comments that Mr. Dawson made recently I think it is appropriate to remind him that the recall effort is not based on policy differences. It is based on his behavior that has demonstrate a pattern of threats and violence both within and outside the board meeting room that is unacceptable to the recall proponents.



But mostly I am posting this to let the community members who have been so encouraging and helpful in this recall effort know that we have not violated anyone's property rights.

Thank you for all of your support!

www.recalldawson.com

Thank you,

Don Flint
MillieP
|
February 02, 2012
I thought the comments I have been reading came from Bob. Now it all makes sense. If it smells Piepho it probably is Piepho. Shame on you David Piepho for even getting involved in this type of controversy. Did Mary put you up to this?
todbresident
|
February 02, 2012
I think it's interesting that the same small-minded people keep "disagreeing" with opinions rendered by legal representatives and elected officials. I seem to recall that Mr. Richardson and Mr. Flint also disagreed with the Contra Costa County DA about whether or not the CSD was in violation of the Brown Act. They are (as they have always been) on the wrong side of the law, and clearly are not interested in what is in the best interests of our community, which would be for us all to get along, and us all to spend our time and money frugally rather than wasting it on pointless and costly witch hunts.
whose_fault
|
February 02, 2012
I think the utter wrongness of a group of folks attempting to recall someone because they disagree with him is apparent here:

“I had personally sent an e-mail on Friday (Jan. 27) to Mr. (Don) Flint, and our legal team and legal counsel did as well. Mr. Flint’s response was that he disagreed.”

I mean, if you will disagree with the public representative and legal team of a large company on the policy THEY created for THEIR property and way of doing business - and go against it doing as you please - what won't you disagree with? Is the sky not blue either?
todbresident
|
February 02, 2012
I am glad the petitioners were ousted from Safeway's doorstep. I personally find it obnoxious to have people stop me to sign petitions before I enter an establishment. I'm there to shop, not to be accosted before I walk in. And I certainly don't want to be accosted by anyone trying to sell me on an expensive recall election when the person being "recalled" has done a great job for the Discovery Bay community. The issue at hand has nothing to do with our town. It is a personal issue between Mr. Dawson and his family, and from what I've read in the Press previously, it sounds like Mr. Dawson has taken steps to ensure another incident doesn't occur, and has actually shared his own personal story so that the community will better understand what happened. And his wife has publicly stated her support for him and his efforts. I see absolutely no reason for this recall. We aren't talking about misappropriation of funds, or about poor policy decisions. We are talking about something that has absolutely nothing to do with Mr. Dawson's position as CSD Director.

I can't think of a bigger time-waster or money-waster for our community than this recall effort. How about focusing on the community center or cleaner/better-tasting water or the peripheral canal or continued town beautification efforts or community events?? The CSD has been doing a great job, but there is still much that can be done for the community. This recall ain't it.

Tim_Haverson
|
February 02, 2012
And let the spinning by the pro-recall people begin in...

3

2

1!
burkforoakley
|
February 02, 2012
This article could have included the fact a Brentwood resident was working to gather signatures for a Discovery Bay recall--which is a major no-no in the recall process in California.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the discretion of thepress.net.