Seven apply for P-6 committee
by Ruth Roberts
Sep 17, 2009 | 666 views | 8 8 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Seven Discovery Bay residents have thrown their hats into the P-6 advisory committee ring, applying for one of the five available seats on the panel that will oversee the expenditure of police services and P-6 dollars.

Dannica Earl, who lives in the Centex area of Discovery Bay, has submitted an application and sees the volunteer position as a way to keep the P-6 playing field level.

“I was informed that we didn’t have any representation from our particular part of Discovery Bay, and since it’s a pretty big area, I thought I would apply,” said Earl. “I absolutely think it is a good idea to have someone from each zone to sit on the committee to make sure that everyone is comfortable with the way things are being handled.”

Chuck Faris lives in the Lakeshore development and said he is applying for a spot on the committee for many of the same reasons as Earl: “It is my understanding that most of the P-6 funds are coming out of Lakeshore and I’m mostly concerned and interested in a reasonable application of funds versus spending. I think it’s important to be there.”

The other committee applicants are Bob Mankin, Carlos Taborini, Chris Finetti and Duane Steele. Mankin and Taborini live in the Lakeshore development and Finetti and Steele are residents of The Lakes community.

The P-6 committee guidelines stipulate that there be no more than two members from any one of the five P-6 zones. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, at the recommendation of Supervisor Mary Piepho, will appoint the committee’s members.

The formation of the group came at the request of Discovery Bay West P-6 contributors, whose approximately $500,000 in P-6 taxes funded the town’s two new resident deputies and crime prevention specialist. The purpose of the volunteer committee is to submit reports and recommendations to the Board of Supervisors based on the disbursement of funds and services.

Although the deadline for the committee applications was officially Sept. 15, Lea Castleberry, Piepho’s deputy chief of staff, said interested residents are still welcome to apply: “We have had a nice response, but at this point I would still encourage those who are interested to send in an application because we don’t know yet where everyone resides and if they’ll meet the residency requirements.”

Those interested in serving on the committee may obtain an application by calling the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors in Martinez at 925-335-1900, or Piepho’s office at 925-820-8683.
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
rick lemyre
|
September 23, 2009
This post has been moved:

http://myforum.allthewaytodiscoverybay.com/user/Discussion.aspx?id=196542

All comments from this point on will be deleted.
Go Sheriff !
|
September 23, 2009
P6..

The Sheriff did have a committee that were residents of the P6 area. It doesn't make any difference now if it's "Piepho or Rupf ". Now that he is steping down he will probably take Piepho's job anyway in the next election.
P6 Resident
|
September 22, 2009
I completely disagree with both Dennis and Too Much Politics. As a resident paying P6 taxes, I absolutely want an oversight committee comprised of residents who actually pay this tax. This committee is intended to ensure that the monies that we pay are spent properly. It would be completely inappropriate to let the sheriff be the sole person to determine how our tax dollars are spent, and frankly these taxes have nothing to do with the CSD or CSD duties. As for who should be on the committee, as long as all members are people who are actually paying into the funds, I have no problem with Supervisor Piepho making the decision, and I think it makes sense that residents who helped to bring this issue to the forefront be considered for inclusion in the committee. This would include Bob Mankin and Carlos Taborini, both of whom were vocal and frankly instrumental in ensuring that the funds were allocated and spent on enhanced police services.
Too Much Politics
|
September 22, 2009
Dennis,

You are right on the money. This smells of politics and should be about Law Enforcement.

Let the Sheriff and the CSD handle it, period
Dennis J
|
September 22, 2009
I think this whole P6 committee is full of manipulation and a bad idea. Discovery Bay is one community and this seems to be another wedge being driven by people seeking to create a East vs. West conflict for their own benefit. Yes, I pay the P6 tax and many don't but many on the water and golf course pay a lot more taxes than I do for the same services. The P tax was a condition of approval to build out the West side of Discovery Bay, very simple no other explanation necessary. Now it seems this is just one more opportunity for Mary Piepho to extend political control and reward her friends. We elected the CSD to represent the whole town and to provide advise to the Board of Supervisors, why do we need a separate committee to do what we already have (elected) people in place to do? This P6 committee makes me feel like I'm not part of the "real" DIscovery Bay.

I also want to point out that at least one guy seeking appointment is a guy with a known bias who has been outspoken against the sheriff, his name is Bob Mankin. It should also be known that Mankin sent a letter to the county purportedly claiming to represent the residents of Discovery Bay West. For sure this guy was never elected to anything and does not represent me or anyone I know. If Mary Piepho appoints this guy (or anyone else involved in that letter) she will be sending a loud message that this whole thing is a sham and stunt for the benefit of her political supporters. I think the best idea is to forget about this committee and let the CSD do what they were elected to do and let the sheriff do what he was elected to do. In my opinion mixed agendas and politics have no place in matters of law enforcement.
Mikie
|
September 21, 2009
The one person you don't want on this committe is Duanne Steele? Bad reputation and has cost the Lakeshore HOA thousands of dollars in re-call elections. Does not participate in the Lakeshore community.

Has no support in the P-6 Zone and will only cause problems.

Mary Piepho, do not consider this volunter as he will only look after his own interests and not the community as a whole.
Brian Dawson
|
September 17, 2009
The more transparency we get in Government the better, right? They (committee members) are unpaid volunteers and ensure more public interaction in the process, how can you ever think an oversight committee is a bad thing?
Redundant
|
September 17, 2009
Why are the Supervisors trying to take the Sheriff's job ? ?

Doesn't the Sheriff already have a committee ??
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the discretion of thepress.net.