Guest Comment: The failure of the loyal opposition
by Dr. Rick Rogers
Jul 07, 2011 | 1523 views | 1 1 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
As superintendent of the Oakley Union Elementary School District, almost daily I receive numerous updates and editorials from various education-related organizations reporting on events in Sacramento. Most that I have recently received have been focused on the status of the state budget.

Shortly after the legislature passed the budget for a second time I received the following editorial from EdBrief, an online education resource. I found it one of the most interesting commentaries on the current state of politics. Having been involved in the collective bargaining process for nearly 30 years, it really resonated with me. In addition, I found their opinion so thought provoking I wanted to share it outside the usual education sector.

“‘Irrelevant Opposition – A Loss for Democracy’

“This week, California’s Democratic legislators rammed through the process on party-line votes, and swiftly approved a supposedly ‘balanced’ state budget. Governor Brown – a Democrat who two weeks ago vetoed a previous Democratic budget – has indicated that he will sign this new budget package, since this time he helped forge the plan.

Not involved in the budget discussion-making are the Republicans, who have been completely sidelined after months of ‘negotiations’ behind closed doors, which included considerable enticement by Governor Brown.

“No one should be surprised by the Governor’s failure to reach a bipartisan agreement despite his tireless effort. The political climate, both in Sacramento and across the nation, is not conducive to give and take. Compromise – an essential component in any smoothly-functioning multiparty democratic system – has become a dirty word. An attitude of ‘if you are not with us, then you are against us’ now runs deep through our political fiber. Never mind that the imposition of a solution crafted by a one-sided point of view only gives rise to tyranny, and weakens democratic institutions.

“In our current poisonous political environment, moderation is frowned upon, and a willingness to listen to a different point of view is considered a weakness of character. When reaching compromise for greater public benefit is labeled as a betrayal or a sell-out, it is no wonder that logic and rationality fail to prevail.

“Now one would think that the elders in California’s Republican party might see an advantage in promoting a compromise on a budget deal – in a way that would allow the Republican legislative minority to help determine how the new revenues would be generated, as well as how the necessary budget reductions would be applied, and critical (but still fledgling) economic recovery would be preserved.

“Instead the Republican leadership has allowed their party to be sidelined by barely participating in the budget process, leaving it to the Democratic legislature and Governor to impose their will.

“The new state budget has been passed, like it or not. There will be numerous analyses coming out in the next week, decrying both the revenue generation plan and the reductions included in the budget. Pundits will no doubt dissect every aspect of the budget and wring their hands about all the ‘what-ifs.’

“All those analyses aside, the simple and sad fact remains that the main, and only, opposition party in the California legislature has rendered itself inconsequential. That, indeed, is a regrettable event and it is not good for our democracy.”
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
raffeyg
|
July 29, 2011
I would think the answer to the reason why the Republicans sat on the sideline during this budget process came in the first paragraph of the quoted article:

“This week, California’s Democratic legislators rammed through the process on party-line votes, and swiftly approved a supposedly ‘balanced’ state budget. Governor Brown – a Democrat who two weeks ago vetoed a previous Democratic budget – has indicated that he will sign this new budget package, since this time he helped forge the plan.

It seems to me, this vote was going to happen whether the Republicans joined the debate or not - so - why bother? It may be a political move - but they, the Republicans, will share no blame for this disaster of a budget,and, oh, how the Democrats love to blame.

The writer of the article is probably saddened by that fact alone, that the Republicans can't be blamed, and has now turned it around to make it sound like they don't want to participate in our democracy - they are "irrelevant." It feels like an "Atlas Shrugged" moment to me...

Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the discretion of thepress.net.