The meetings could not have been much more different. In Byron, the new Municipal Advisory Council (MAC) members – Linnea Juarez, Al Beltran, Don Della Nina, Ron Schmit and Dennis Lopez – quickly appointed Juarez chair and Beltran vice chair. They got a rundown on county business from District III Supervisor Mary Nejedly Piepho, reports from police and the East Contra Costa Fire Protection District, and stopped the meeting briefly to file outside and inspect a new fire engine. In front of an attentive but mostly silent audience, the MAC talked briefly about meeting space, park dedication fees, code enforcement and the Brown Act, and was done.
Six days later and a few miles away, the new Knightsen Town Advisory Council (KTAC) members – Linda Weeks, Jack Burge, Chantel Tieman and Mike Walko (one seat remains unfilled) – picked Weeks as chair and Walko as vice chair. The agency reports and updates from Piepho ran about the same, but the crowd of about 100 was anything but sedentary. Before the evening ended, there were arguments, complaints, loud voices and an impromptu, near-unanimous show-of-hands vote to return things to the way they had been. Occasionally, shouts ricocheted around the room like shrapnel, but in the end, Roberts Rules of Order – and Weeks’ rubber mallet gavel – contained the passion, and business got done.
Battle of the boundaries
It was one particular piece of business that had packed both meetings – highly unusual for the two bodies, which typically meet in an otherwise empty room. Over the last two and a half years under the direction of Piepho and District V Supervisor Federal Glover, new policies and boundaries had been created for all the county’s advisory councils. The goal had been to standardize procedures and develop consistent boundary guidelines using roads, other established boundaries and geographic features.
The guidelines also called for “uninhabited or sparsely populated” areas to be excluded (unless development was expected) and for the boundaries to contain only “the community of interest for each MAC area.” The criteria, which had been the subject of a number of public and county staff meetings, resulted in both the Byron MAC and KTAC losing more than half of their area of representation. (The areas are still the largest physically of the 11 MACs, and have the lowest populations.)
Knightsen’s John Gonzales believes that the new guidelines are unfair. Knightsen, by its very nature, is sparsely populated, and a handful of families mean more to the 1,000 residents of his community than they do, for example, to the 21,000 people in Bay Point’s MAC. What’s more, the newly excluded wide-open spaces and marinas are at the very essence of their “community of interest.”
“That’s part of what Knightsen is: hunting, fishing, boating,” Gonzales said. “That’s been taken from us.”
Byron’s Kathy Leighton believes that by removing areas long identified with Byron from the MAC referral area, the town of Discovery Bay will find it that much easier some day – maybe 20 years from now – to annex the land and develop it. She believes it is a design pursued deliberately by Discovery Bay resident Piepho, and her husband David, who is a member of the Discovery Bay CSD Board of Directors.
Underlying cause
But while boundaries might have been the immediate reason for a sudden shortage of folding chairs in the two town halls, the underlying cause of the commotion stretches back for years. Residents of far East County had never seen their county representative elected from their area, and had endured decades of relative neglect before Piepho was elected in 2004 and re-elected in 2008.
Piepho’s first term had been fraught with challenges and learning experiences from the outset. In addition to a term on the Byron Union School District board, Piepho could draw on her experience on a cemetery district board and as a staff member for assemblypersons Lynne Leach and Guy Houston, as well as the tutelage and example of her late father, the iconic State Senator John Nejedly.
But she took her county seat without having put together an administration before, and the challenges of putting this one together were substantial. She received minimal transition help from her predecessor, was creating a far East County representation on the Board of Supervisors (BOS) that had never before existed, and had frequent turnover on her five-person staff at the outset. She hailed from Discovery Bay, a town that saw its first resident move in during the early 1970s and that had since ballooned to more than 16,000, thereby assuming the face of the suburban wolf at the doors of the tiny towns of Byron and Knightsen.
As Piepho worked to get her office up and running amid high expectations and shadows of suspicion, detractors began to find each other. A few dozen in number, they used blogs, e-mails and letters to newspapers to voice their criticism, and they laid it on heavily.
Liz Van Sandwyck is among the most virulent of Piepho’s opponents. With a resolute manner and a stern voice, she has found fault with virtually every move Piepho has made, or not made. Her conversation is peppered with comments such as “Show me one thing (Piepho) has done for Byron,” but one could argue that the examples are many. Piepho has initiated or helped secure new laws allowing wineries in Contra Costa, safety improvements on Vasco Road, traffic studies to improve traffic flow and pedestrian safety, roadway improvements on J4, and money for a study on building Highway 239, to list a few.
Facing forward
The key to that list, however, is the word “argue,” which opponents are wont to do. They downplay Piepho’s role in some of those accomplishments, and can quickly draw up a list of their own outlining her perceived shortcomings. For the past two years, the back-and-forth has grown in volume and ferocity, building into a communication-stifling cacophony of claims and counterclaims.
Linnea Juarez, the new chair of the Byron MAC, is dealing with a cacophony of a different kind. She sits at a small wooden table in the most remote part of the Wild Idol Saloon, but there’s no escaping the karaoke. It’s her first time visiting the tavern, which is located on Byron’s Main Street, next to the Library Club where a MAC meeting has just ended.
“I find it exciting” to represent her community, she yells over the din. “Everyone (on the MAC) has their own area of expertise, their own list of contacts. And the more people you have in your Rolodex, the more successful you’re going to be.”
The historic watering hole isn’t the only thing with which she’s unfamiliar. Most of the political histrionics have occurred while she was otherwise occupied with her career, and now that a schedule change has enabled her to contribute to her community, she’s not sure she’s interested in hearing it all.
“I don’t care about the fights that have gone before,” she said. Describing herself as “hard-nosed, stubborn and outspoken,” she scoffs at the suggestion that she might have been hand-picked by Piepho to do her bidding (all MAC terms expired when the new policies were enacted in December). “I’m not the right person to pick as a puppet, by any means,” she said.
Pose the same suggestion to Weeks and you’ll get a similar reaction. You’ll also hear a similar lack of interest in waging old wars: “I’ve got enough to do just handling right now.” The tasks include completing the current review of Knightsen’s boundaries, securing a historical designation for the Garden Club and enlisting the aid of other residents and former MAC members in moving the town into the future.
“We all have the same thing, an undying loyalty to Knightsen,” she said. “We have to take that, bind it all together and face forward.”
Guarded optimism
And there is much to look forward to. For despite the criticism and the clamor over Piepho’s experience, processes, treatment of people and alleged ulterior motives, the two towns find themselves with clear, consistent policies and boundaries for the first time, an energized populace attending MAC meetings, a cadre of new, enthusiastic representatives (who, despite earlier concerns about their loyalty, are now seen as independent community advocates), and an “old guard” that, although perhaps wary, continues to contribute the historical context the new panel’s need.
Leighton is one of those looking forward, albeit from a somewhat fatalist perspective. She sees that regional pressures and the demands of development already in place will continue to impact Byron, and that the will of the many will always outweigh that of the few. She knows that change will come to her home town, but she’ll continue to fight to save as much as possible for as long as possible. She’s not sure if her trust in Piepho can be restored, but with signs of improved communication already in place (for example, regular meetings involving all the MACs have been restored), she’s hopeful of an improved working relationship.
Gonzales remains suspicious as well, although the fact that it’s of Piepho is of less importance. Whether its the BOS, the City of Oakley or any other agency, he’ll mount the same energetic defense he mounts any time he believes his home town is being threatened. He’ll spend even more energy proactively, be it putting together town calendars, organizing the annual Knightsen Days event or helping man the bins on community trash day. As for his admittedly “rocky relationship” with Piepho, that can be fixed.
“I want to see something tangible that we can see is the direct result of her leadership,” he said. The fact that funding had been identified to repair the town’s sidewalks isn’t enough. “I want to see some concrete. I want to actually be able to put my hands on something. And I will help all I can to get things done.”
Beyond the horizon
Piepho, too, is looking to the future, and her perspective is that of a pragmatist. She does not expect the attacks of a few constituents to stop, and vows to continue doing her job regardless. In addition to her duties in far East County, there’s a financial crisis and other critical county issues to deal with, as well as her responsibilities to constituents in Walnut Creek, Alamo, Danville, San Ramon, Diablo, Brentwood, Blackhawk and the Tassajara Valley. She has recently been named the representative of the five-county Delta region in talks about the newly resurfaced Peripheral Canal, a plan to increase water exports to Southern California that her father helped defeat in the 1980s.
Overlaying the many practical matters are numerous intangibles that have helped lead to the current situation: Piepho’s initial inexperience, her methodology that left some feeling ignored, and the consideration of regional needs that conflict with local desires. For the residents of Byron and Knightsen, there’s an entrenched defensive posture, their use of tactics sometimes seen as personal and destructive, and a measure of stubbornness and impatience. And impacting both are the area’s tremendous needs, a lack of money to address them, and frustration with the other side.
Perhaps it will be in overcoming the obstacle of the past that will mark a coming of age in far East County. For the towns, there is the possibility that their legacy will one day be that of the communities that stood battling on the front lines when the sprawl of development was arrested, and the world went green, like they are. For Piepho, there is the prospect that she could one day be seen as a rookie administrator beset with challenges who became an adept leader seasoned by experience and withering fire from her critics.
Whether either scenario will ultimately play out is yet to be seen, but at least one thing is certain: The high expectations that helped lead to the present situation have not diminished, and will grow only higher as the future unfolds.




http://www.contracostatimes.com/danielborenstein/ci_12149993
Your children will be paying all those spent lap dances for generations to come unless your fantasy gal does something soon.
I was refering to "spiking pensions" and thier detriment to the finances of public agencies.
I cannot respond any longer to a no name intial that has fantasies about Piepho. Keep " beating your head ", you may get some common sense.
This is more than likely going to be the last time I respond to one of your posts. I do not enjoy beating my head up against a wall.
I am not and will not argue that the number, 1.6 billion isn't a large number. That being said, if we were both reasonable men, we could agree without hesitation that a one billion dollar decrease in five years is also large. Since that number has gone down during Ms. Piepho’s term, two reasonable men could agree that maybe, just maybe, Mary Piepho isn’t the devil.
Your problem is the sphere of your interest and the hallway vision of your concern. You’re a concerned citizen and concerned citizens concern me.
You don’t like the way the law works, you think it’s incomplete? Show so integrity and conviction and run for office, change things. You could take the cowardly route and sue or do what your doing, which is more sad than cowardly and continue throwing out numbers and outrage like dollar bill in a strip club, quoting hack journalists, on the web site of an advertiser.
What our Supervisors should do is lobby to make this a crime and illegal. It is a pyramid type scam and the loosers are the end employees and taxpayers when the public entity ( CoCo County or ??) have to slash current day pensions to suppliment past spikers...
'Spiking' of public pensions is costing taxpayers
http://www.contracostatimes.com/danielborenstein/ci_12127833
The chief of the Moraga Orinda Fire District, knows how to play the retirement system. That's why he was able to convert a $185,000 annual salary into a $241,000 yearly pension.
How did he do it? Primarily by taking maximum advantage of rules that enabled him to sell back unused vacation and holidays. As a result, he increased his starting annual pension payment 46 percent, from $165,000 a year to the $241,000 yearly total.
THIS SHOULD BE A CRIME...............
I noticed your 137 Billion dollar comment, It's actually ONLY 2.7 Billion dollars
$ 2,700,000,000.00
Give or take a million $ 1,000,000.00 here or there....... Of course, current lay offs should affect the debt in a positive way a few thousand dollars for us taxpayers. $ 2.7 Billion is quite a bit of money.
Several years of the entire county budget, that's scary !!
More Importantly, I thought before all the trashing of commentors back and forth we were talking about Knightsen and Byron's unwanted push into urbanisum.
Anyway below are thew facts taken from the County Website,
http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/DocumentView.asp?DID=1652
Impending onset of GASB 45 has prompted an independent actuarial valuation of the County’s existing commitments
to provide retiree healthcare (OPEB1)
County is required to account for the cost of OPEB liabilities beginning in FY 2007-08
GASB 45 did not “cause” these liabilities, but rather has caused governments at all levels to fully quantify the
lifecycle costs of previous benefit decisions / existing promises
The County has a very large liability ($2.57 billion)
– Actuarial study shows County should be setting aside $227 million per year
– County is not setting aside anything, instead, County is operating on a “Pay-go” basis, just incurring current cost
– Regardless of GASB 45, the County faces a tripling of its $33 million annual retiree health care costs over the next
decade
County currently pays $33.1 million on a pay-as-you-go basis and should be paying an annual contribution of $227
million
The County must develop a funding strategy as well as a labor negotiation strategy
___________________________
1. “OPEB” means “Other Post-Employment Benefits.”
This presentation is intended to address how OPEB costs will impact the County’s
Since I make typos and misspellings I will not be calling you on yours, that's how that integrity thing works, you see. I will make a comment on your comment as to the reason you don’t use “paragraphs”, but my argument will not touch the rules of grammar.
Let us begin.
“Since when does education not count?”
Education counts, but the lack thereof does not make one less suited for office. Andrew Jackson, William Harrison, Zachary Taylor, Millard Fillmore, Andrew Johnson, Grover Cleveland and Abraham Lincoln all served as POTUS without a college education. By your measurement, Mr. Lincoln didn’t have the experience to end slavery and deliver the union from the grasp of civil war. Alaska just elected Mark Begich to the Senate and he has no college degree.
“Why do you think companies are searching for educated personnel abroad?”
I don’t see much of this, but I also don’t work HR at Cisco. Many successful entrepreneurs have no college degree. Here is a small list: (I back my opinion with fact)
Richard Branson, Henry Ford, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Micheal Dell, and Walt Disney to name a few.
“As for paragraphs, I don't like to waste space.”
Lady, I know you are older and haven’t really grabbed onto this whole 21st century thing, but the internet is very similar to outer space in regards to its “unlimited or incalculable” size.
“Trying to discredit my opinion by complaining about my paragraphs is more of a diversion effort on your part to make the Supervisor look good?”
I don’t think that was what he/she was trying to do, I think they were just pointing out your glaring hypocrisy.
“As for her move on taking a vacation in the middle of County financial crisis is pretty stupid on her part. It showed many she could care less about any of the department cuts and financial crisis. A person concerned about this County or a caring person would have been there to show support and CONCERN.”
Now you’re spinning, but maybe you are too daft to know the difference. The budget process is long and missing a few meetings didn’t slow it down one bit. As a matter of fact, Ms. Piepho sat through eight STRAIGHT hours of the aforementioned budget meetings about a week ago.
“Heck she uses that concerned term to complete many underhanded actions.”
It is so easy to say something in passing on the internet. It’s so easy to attempt to divert attention, using smoke signals, red herrings, etc. Isn’t it, Ms. Jackson?
“Why did the other 4 feel it was so important to be there?”
You must be best friends with all four to know that.
“Could it have been because they cared?”
Could also be they already took a vacation. Could be they hate to travel. Could be they are gearing up for an Assembly run. Could be because of health issues. Could be a million reasons that have nothing to do with “caring”.
“For some reason you think our Supervisor is a mental giant.”
I don’t read that anywhere here. I don’t think they are saying Ms. Piepho is a mental giant, just that you’re a mental midget.
“I am still waiting for the list of accomplishments going on 5 years”
I think we are still waiting for yours.
“and by the way it isn't just the $52 Million shortfall it is the $137 BILLION or god knows how much now, out of whack pension obligations.”
Where did you get that number? That’s over three times the shortfall for the whole state of California. Did you just think of a really big number, one that would make people blush?
“Did she loose her calculator the past 5 years?”
When Ms. Piepho took office the Counties liability (OPEB) was at $2.6 billion. It currently sits at $1.6 billion, a billion dollar decrease since she entered office. If everything bad in CoCo County is Ms. Piepho's fault then everything good is her fault as well. It would appear her calculator is working just fine.
“As for the thin election you keeping bring that back I told previously so what,again move on?”
In politics, a win is a win. You may win by 1,000,000,000 votes or you may win by 5 , either way you win, baby. You carry so much anger over this, so much so you go out of your way to commit libel every chance you get.
“I question the womans, ability, qualificaitons and yes EDUCATION!”
I know I said I wouldn’t do this, but with education in bold letters….care to count the grammatical errors in that single sentence?
“And by the way Houston got stuck with Piepho when he took over the office and kicked her to the curb as soon as possible without getting sued”
Can you prove that? I’m pretty sure she left when she decided to run for office. I think you have a bright future telling bedtime stories to Bill Richardson. How would anyone know about Guy Houston’s employment details regarding Mary anyways? Those records would be CONFIDENTIAL and protected by strict employee laws…
“like she sued Portway when she filed a lawsuit because she couldn't do what she was instructed to do.”
Is that what the lawsuit was about? I have a new game, let’s play "count the number of times Carol Jackson will show her blind, pathetic anger, and hatred of the Piepho’s; while attempting to defame their characters”!
“I have not seen her picked people able to answer a question without having to get back to the person asking.”
Lea and Karyn have been very helpful to not only me, but many friends of my family's. Again, just throw a lie out there enough times and it becomes truth, Ms. Jackson?
Ok, So I tried to piece something together from the rest of your post, but you must have been at the bottom of a bottle of Jack because it made no sense and was full of opinion and speculation.
I challenge you to prove all this. I will write up a list of the things you have said against Ms. Piepho and you bring us proof….better yet, Rick, why don’t you take this challenge and set the record straight?
Mr. Move Over:
In 2008, Mary Piepho took home $105,133.44. It’s on the county spread sheet. What you and your friends don’t know, because you don’t actually research, is that Ms. Piepho doesn’t take health from the county. She does not double-dip.
Oh and about the stipend, you were super wrong on that one. Mary got rid of the stipend when they got the pay raise.
Since we wouldn't want to believe you're just pulling these numbers out of your arse, why not provide a link to whatever county budget doc you read that supports your claims?
That is a little much for her to increase her pay 62% to reach that total. I have to agree with the others, she is not worth that not with a high school diploma something is wrong here!
You hate the lady, we got it. You love Houston, we got that too. But which one is no longer holding office? Hmmmmmm.
I guess you couldn't drum up enough BS with your hit piece mailer to fool enough folks into voting for him?
The Supervisors control somewhere around $300M of discretionary funding each year. What is your proposal, simply eliminate all other spending to fund the OPEB? 5 years of nothing but OPEB? Is that you demonstrating your brilliance with a calculator?
I love the rant about asking questions. If you don’t get an immediate answer you throw a tantrum like a 2 year old? Wouldn’t an accurate question be the dominate factor over immediacy? You write like you hang with the local litigious group. You would be about the last person to give anything but a thoroughly researched answer because you’re just looking for something new to complain about.
Go outside and take a walk. Enjoy this nice weather. Might help you lose some of your anger.
While you are talking about education, it's called a paragraph, learn to use it.
If Piepho is so bad, show some integrity and grit and run against her. I'm sure if you do that 3,000 will be more like 300,000.
Tell me, what does taking a vacation or not do to bridge a $52M shortfall in revenue. BE SPECIFIC, as you like to shout.
You're obviously a big Sheriff fan. How many times during this budget crisis will we find him traveling to his homes in Tucson or the Red Bluff area? He appears to take time off quite frequently. How do you justify that while his Dept is under siege? Can you or he give us any assurances that he hasn’t done that this quarter during ongoing budget negotiations?
The fact is my example is no more rational than yours. It's petty. It solves nothing. Revenue shortfalls are a fact of life throughout this country right now. Unless you are living in a bubble or under a rock, you would know that and not pretend this is something unique to CC County or this BoS. But that wouldn't support your rant then would it? The Sheriff largely escaped this declining revenue problem for many years.....until this one. Ask him why the front line guys are getting axed, while CAO recommendations for cost cutting were put off for months. Ask why high paying multi-six figure spots like under Sheriff stayed. That's a program to groom people for fat pension exits and not much more. I'll take 3 Deputies on the streets over that any day.
The repeat of the education thing is more evidence of your weak stance. You clearly haven't seen the Supervisor in action or you're so blinded by your obvious hatred of the woman that you have no objectivity whatsoever. I have to work with multi-degreed brainiacs, on occasion, right up to PHD's and some of them barely have the common sense to tie their shoes. The point being that a degree doesn’t automatically make you smart in the real world or the best qualified for the elected office. Apparently quite a few folks agreed in the last election. You also seem to forget that the unemployed ex-Assemblyman you are ga-ga over highly recommended her skills in the past.........until it was politically necessary for him to change his comments. I guess integrity was optional in his campaign.
The 62% number you continue to repeat speaks to the feeble thinking crowd. It's out of context. It doesn't mention that prior to that they were the lowest paid in the region and the lowest paid of the 15 most populace areas in the state. The funny part is, had it not been for that raise, you can be pretty damn sure your termed out Assemblyman wouldn't have been running for the Supervisor spot! And where did that raise idea originate? In a GRAND JURY recommendation. I don't see you faulting them here. Why?
http://www.cc-courts.org/_data/n_0038/resources/live/0702rpt.pdf
Which contains the following:
"The Grand Jury recommends that the salaries for the Board of Supervisors and their office staff be increased to a level on par with those of similarly sized counties to attract and retain the professionals required to address the serious challenges facing the County."
As you clearly noted, you expressed your OPINION. It’s unfortunate you can’t keep at least some familiarity with FACTS during one of your rants. It’s always funny when anyone chimes in with comments like “The citizens of this County and the political community are appaulled at her absence….”. What arrogance. Who the hell appointed you the county spokesperson for community sentiment? You obviously don’t speak for all of us and it’s ridiculous to suggest that you even speak for more than a handful.
Can't you do better than the same, worn out, manipulative talking points from an election 10 months ago?
62%
Keep saying it.
Repeat repeat repeat.
62%
Keep blaming it on Mary.
If you repeat it, they will come.
Let’s be frank. You abuse the first amendment.
Mary Piepho is part of a board of people, she does nothing HERSELF, she isn' the CEO. $87,622 is the pay in Linn county Iowa. Freaking Iowa people. How much more does the CoCo County Supervisors make? Care to guess what the difference is in the cost of living between the two different counties? The raise didn’t come until she had been in office two years. Before that, the supervisors made 50K. WOW.
40 Deputies lost? Mary Piepho’s fault, totally, not Warren Rupf, who makes over $400,000 a year. He gets two pay checks and he isn’t alittle to blame? Of course not, your bias is showing and its very unbecoming.
TARP money? The Troubled Asset Relief Program is for banks. Mary Piepho must own a bank or a rather large piece of AIG. I would be embarrassed if I lived in the town you are representing and I’m sure the word “anonymous” is just as embarrassed with your earlier posting.
One thing Mary has done… She beat Guy Houston, thank god.
Give us something you have done for this county, your town, my town for that matter, East County? You people, the ones you hide behind the first amendment like cowards, who throw stones from the cheap seats, who troll around the internet using fact names pushing propaganda, costing tax payers thousands of dollars in your PRA witch-hunt of the week, who are fading away behind a typewriter, who sue towns over interpretations, who threaten to sue, who even mention the word “class-action”, who think they have the right to do whatever they want on water and roads no matter how it may injure or threaten the safety of others, who start fires with shabby research and BS articles, who can’t get a termed out Assembly member elected to a county board, who just yell and yell at the rain, it is just so obvious, so hard to watch, so disgusting.
Though elect officials deserve scrutiny, they also deserve privacy. Where they go on vacation, when they go, that is no ones business.
Mary and David Piepho have done nothing to you people. Get a hobby. Become a mentor. Take a journalism class. Actually move into Byron or Discovery Bay, plant a tree, feed the poor, get a hair cut, stop taking steroids, start taking steroids, you all know who you are. These people have done nothing to you.
“Among the Bay Area's cities and counties, the eastern Contra Costa County city of Brentwood scored the highest for the condition of its streets - with a rating of 84. The worst roads were in Sonoma County, which has many miles of rural routes, with a score of 44.” -SF Chron.
"In the East Bay, the fast-growing cities of Brentwood, Oakley, Dublin ranked among the best roads in "very good" condition, while Orinda had roads in "poor condition" and the worst of any city in the nine Bay Area counties, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission reported.’ –Tribune 1/09
‘Contra Costa County roads in unincorporated areas ranked in "very good" condition, while Alameda County roads ranked in the middle of pack with a rating just making the "good' rating.’ –Tribune 1/09
A report by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission is giving a "fair" grade to the region's roads.
The study released Monday says pavement conditions between 2005 and 2007 were largely stable, with a slight improvement in a rating system the commission uses to rate roads in the region.
Still, the commission says large stretches of asphalt will require repair work soon.
The report says the best roads in the region are in the Contra Costa County city of Brentwood and the Santa Clara County city of Los Altos. –NBC 1/06/09
A common denominator with the critics appears to be the inability to research even a single correct fact for themselves. They demand answers, but have no real interest in hearing or reading them.
Sorry, I've only used one name, you must have me confused with one of the voices in your head.
Hey, are you the Gal from Brentwood that spent some $7,000 in a hit piece mailer against Piepho that last election? That would explain a lot.