County advised to pull plug on Ranch
by Ruth Roberts
Apr 23, 2009 | 602 views | 1 1 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The Contra Costa County Grand Jury has recommended the closure of the Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Center, above, after nearly 50 years. The grand jury estimates the county will save $5 million annually by shutting down the 50-acre facility in Byron.<br><i>Photo by Ruth Roberts</i>
The Contra Costa County Grand Jury has recommended the closure of the Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Center, above, after nearly 50 years. The grand jury estimates the county will save $5 million annually by shutting down the 50-acre facility in Byron.
Photo by Ruth Roberts
slideshow
The Contra Costa County Grand Jury has recommended the closure of the Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Center – known as the Bryon Boys Ranch – citing neglect and lack of rehabilitation as the primary reasons for shutting down the nearly 50-year-old facility.

The report, entitled “County Youth Rehabilitation Center on Life Support: It’s Time To Pull the Plug,” outlines the jury’s investigation into the running of the ranch that sits on 50 acres off Bixler Road. The report highlights deficiencies found by the jury such as rusted kitchen sinks, broken equipment and debris around the property, worn-out mattresses and what jurors say is a lack of rehabilitation of the youths and inadequate treatment programs.

“Members of the jury went out to the ranch (in September) to do a routine inspection and they found it in such deplorable shape that we sent another team out a few days later for a closer look,” said grand jury foreperson Leslie Lea. “Because many of the programs in the (center’s) handbook were also not operational, we came to the conclusion that it would save the county $5 million if it were to close.”

Boys ranch founder Orin Allen said he hasn’t enjoyed a good night’s sleep since the report came out. Calling it “brutal” and “lacking consideration of the human element,” Allen said he was stunned by the report and hopes the ranch will be saved.

“The thing of it all is that there was not one positive word in that report,” said Allen, who founded the minimum-security facility in 1960. “What about all the good, the amazing good, that has come from having this program? Are there things that need to be fixed? Of course, and they are being addressed as we speak. In a perfect world we would have everything exactly as we would like it to be, but if it’s a question of giving up a mental health program or keeping woodshop for the boys, or cleaning up the yard … well, times are tough; we’re doing what we can.”

But according to the report, it’s not enough. The ranch is currently at its 100-resident capacity, and the recommendation from the grand jury is that the boys be housed in juvenile hall in Martinez and the property be put to better use.

The Rev. Dr. Charles Tinley, a Presbyterian minister with the Juvenile Justice Commission, visits the ranch twice a week and believes the property is being put to good use. Closing the facility he says, would be penny-wise and pound-foolish.

“They (grand jury) just don’t seem to understand what the ranch is all about,” said Tinley. “Juvenile hall is jail. There are no programs there to work with the boys and rehabilitate them. The report says that they came out and there were no programs going on – well it was the middle of the day; the boys were in school. To close this facility would be a grave injustice.”

Supervisor Mary Piepho agreed that the facility is a much-valued arm of the juvenile detention system. But while she respects the grand jury’s findings, she believes there are some places where it (the report) misses the mark.

“The grand jury is a watchdog group and they provide a vital service,” said Piepho. “But I don’t entirely agree with their perspective on this and on the human lives it affects. Yes, it’s an aging facility, but maybe there are other solutions. It’s not a solution for the kids out there to be placed in juvenile hall … It (the boys ranch) is not a wasted effort.”

Allen said that since news of the report surfaced, his phone has been ringing off the hook from friends and well-wishers offering their support.

“People are so angry over this,” he said. “I’ve had calls from the public and from former grads who are now living all over the country, asking what they can do. They simply can’t believe this could be true. You know, we’ve had kids go on to be firemen and Caltrans supervisors and CIA employees, and they have all said that they remember their time and experience at the ranch as positive. To close this would be a big step backward. I just cannot believe they would do this.”

The report was filed in March, and the county probation department has 90 days from the date of the report to respond. The report is a scheduled discussion item at the May 5 Board of Supervisors meeting. To view a copy of the grand jury report, visit www.cc-courts.org, go to “jury service” and click on “civil grand jury.” Grand jury reports for 2009 will be posted.
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Knightsenite
|
April 27, 2009
A sad day if the Boys Ranch closes. The kids there are obviously not perfect. However, they have contributed back to east county everytime asked. They have provided food service to events, road clean up, woodshop projects, cared for animals, and much more. What has not happened is Contra Costa County has fallen behind in maintinence and up keep of the facility. It has also fallen behind with expansions and programs to allow for more housing ability at the center.

When a teen is brought to the Byron facility from the inners of cities that cannot provide proper positive teen activities that teen sees that there is more out there than just a revolving door in the system with no opportunity to really experience life.

Yes it's expensive, but I believe only because the County has stopped investing in the Boys Ranch. Some teens will be lost for ever, but I feel that the Byron Boys Ranch has changed teens lives in a positive way.

To close Byron Boys Ranch is to eliminate that one place left for a troubled teen to ask himself if there is another choice in life.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the discretion of thepress.net.