Garamendi faces tough questioning
by Dave Roberts
Dec 09, 2009 | 695 views | 6 6 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Antioch Mayor Jim Davis, left, and Congressman John Garamendi smile during one of the lighter moments at a mostly contentious town hall meeting Saturday. <br><i>Photo by Dave Roberts</i>
Antioch Mayor Jim Davis, left, and Congressman John Garamendi smile during one of the lighter moments at a mostly contentious town hall meeting Saturday.
Photo by Dave Roberts
slideshow
Congressman John Garamendi held his first town hall meeting in Antioch on Saturday, a month after being elected to serve out the remaining year of Ellen Tauscher’s 10th Congressional District term, and found himself on the firing line.

Hostile, skeptical East County residents peppered him with questions about runaway deficit spending in Washington, D.C., coercive health care legislation and an expensive energy plan to fight global warming, among other issues. Their verbal jabs were met with applause from many in the three-quarters-full City Council chambers.

Garamendi, who supports increased federal spending and regulation, voted for the House health care bill and supports legislation to curb greenhouse gases, stood his ground throughout the two-hour meeting. He listed a variety of national woes in his introductory remarks, but said his main focus for now is helping reduce the nation’s 10-percent unemployment rate.

“There are a lot of things going on in America: issues of wars, the environment, what are we going to do about climate change, health care,” he said. “All of those are critically important to all of us. Also important is the issue of jobs. My immediate goal as your member of Congress is to get the economy moving long term, and short term, putting people to work.”

In addition to continuing to fund the extension of unemployment insurance and the COBRA health insurance subsidy for laid-off workers, Garamendi supports re-enactment of the Great Depression-era Civilian Conservation Corps program to provide government jobs to the unemployed for public works projects.

He also supports spending more on infrastructure projects such as widening Highway 4, bringing eBART to Antioch and building a ferry terminal in Antioch. Only 4 percent of the $787 billion federal stimulus passed in February went for infrastructure, yet that spending has accounted for 25 percent of the jobs created, he said. Spending $60 billion more for such projects would create more than 1.5 million jobs, he said.

But Tom Young, the first resident to speak, provided a simpler, less expensive formula for reducing unemployment: “To put people to work all you need to do is cut the corporate income tax to 10 percent, shorten the permit time to get businesses going, start building nuclear plants – drill, baby, drill – and get the heck out of the way. Because America will put itself to work.”

Another speaker, Richard Weaver, voiced concern about the proposed $500 billion cut to Medicare in the Democrat-sponsored health care legislation. Garamendi responded that the only thing being cut is the subsidy to insurance companies for Medicare Part D coverage. An Antioch nurse criticized the health bill for making it tougher for doctors to receive adequate compensation, an assertion that Garamendi denied. He also told Betty Beck, a senior concerned that the Democrat plan would lead to health care rationing, that she has nothing to fear.

One man urged Garamendi to reign in federal spending, pointing out that the national debt is currently $12 trillion, the health care bill might add another trillion dollars to the debt, and annual payments to service the debt are projected to increase to $700 billion in eight years as the debt rises toward $20 trillion. “Washington needs to live within their means,” he said to big applause.

Garamendi responded that he has problems with the way some of the hundreds of billions of dollars were spent in the bailout of Wall Street firms, but he pointed out that it helped keep the economy from collapsing. “We are seeing some growth in the American economy, although not yet in the jobs area,” he said. “Do we stop and hope that things improve? Or do we continue to stimulate the economy? My take is we continue to stimulate the economy.”

But that answer did not satisfy an Oakley woman who said, “I feel like I’m on the Titanic and the only ticket I’m allowed to buy is in steerage. I applaud the people before me who addressed spending – it is crazy. I think that we better slow down, take a step back.”

Another contentious issue in the two-hour discussion was the cap-and-trade legislation that Garamendi supports to fight global warming. Virginia Costanzo believes global warming is a hoax and that increased regulations on energy to fight it would drive up prices and increase unemployment. “Do you still fall for the (warming) myth?” she asked. “Are you drinking the Kool-Aid? We have been scammed for 20 years.”

Garamendi responded that “there is overwhelming evidence in the scientific field (for global warming). Leave aside the great debate of whether it’s human caused or not. We’ve become more reliant on energy from the most dangerous places in the world – that is not good policy.”
Comments
(6)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Brett Kuntze
|
December 09, 2009
There can be bicycle service shops at intervals on the elevated paths in case you get a flat tire and wont have far to walk to fix it.
Brett Kuntze
|
December 09, 2009
If government encourage more bicyclsts, it will create jobs in the bicycle industry. I am sure that bicyclsts would be more than happy to pay some VAT on bicycles to finance the elevated bicycle path all around the Bay Area and other cities. What bicyclsts need the most is safety and non stop cycling. No more redlights and taking feet off the pedals and on so forth.. keep cycling!! Faster and enjoyable.. I bet that many more millions of bicycles will be sold!!
Brett Kuntze
|
December 09, 2009
I like riding bicycles. I often dream of BART like elevated paths designed for bicyclsts. I dont like competiting with cars on the streets most of the way. I prefer to have access to bicycle only elevated path that cross over towns nonstop with onramps and offramps to certain streets a few miles apart. I like to cycle steadily as I can go 20-25 miles a hour. It should not be that expensive to build lightweight elevated paths for bicyclsts. I would enjoy the view better up there than keeping my eyes out for cars and pedestrains..
Brett Kuntze
|
December 09, 2009
If we have ferry terminal in Antioch, I advise you not to make stops in nearby towns like Pittsburg as it is illogical to do so since Pittsburg is close enough for short trips. If you want the ferry to make stops to pick up more cars , do it at longer intervals like at least 20 miles or so. Antioch will have its own unique stops. Pittsburg its own different ones and so forth. If Hayward decides to have its own ferry terminal , for example, it can have stops at Berkeley or Richmond and probably Redwood City. San Jose to Oakland and Marin County. keep ferry stops at least 20 miles apart. Unlike BART which makes stops a few miles apart which is time consuming. Ferries is for cars and bicycles that can go 20 miles faster on the road than the ferry. dont worry about the details as people will figure it out about the best way to go around. I for one dislike frequent stops like busstops or BART stations which is so unpleasant!!
Brett Kuntze
|
December 09, 2009
Also, ferries can be a great boon to electical cars with limited ranges . We will not need to take on the long highways to distant towns in our future electrical cars. We can instead take ferries there and make short trips there and back home on ferries. We can plug our electrical cars to ferries to recharge a little bit to extend ranges. Ferries is gonna make a big comeback! I emailed similar comments to MTC officials upon request for opinions recently. The MTC officials is considering raising toll prices another dollar to $5. It will not be long before it zooms to $10. Time to act on ferries is now, Congressman John Garamendi !
Brett Kuntze
|
December 09, 2009
I didnt attend the town hall meeting because no sign language interpreter is announced for hearing impaired citizens who may wish to participate there. Anyway, I can ask questions here in this comment page, instead. I just want to tell John Garmamendi that I strongly support a ferry terminal in Antioch. I believe that bridges is already a thing of the past due to rising costs of materials and labor. We will be raising toll prices indefintely like postage stamps with no means of repaying for the construction of the new bridges in the future. Ferries can be easily replaced with new ones without any delays to traffic or whatnots. Unlike New York bridges or Pittsburgh bridges , Bay Area bridges are too long and expensive. Several of them are about ten miles long.. SM bridge, Oakland, San Rafael-Richmond. We will not require any more highway widennings with more ferry service around the Bay. Ferries will save us money in many more ways than we think. We can ride bicycles to the ferries and sail to any city in the Bay. We can have ferry service to Santa Cruz or Eureka if we want to.. Los Angeles?? Ferries are sturdy safe means of transporting cars and bicyles.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the discretion of thepress.net.