Cop oversight debate continues
by Dave Roberts
Jan 14, 2010 | 980 views | 5 5 comments | 11 11 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Council members listen to the debate over the police oversight board, but afterward declined to comment on it.<br><i>Photo by Dave Roberts</i>
Council members listen to the debate over the police oversight board, but afterward declined to comment on it.
Photo by Dave Roberts
slideshow
Argentina Davila Luevano, an Antioch resident and representative of the League of United Latin American Citizens, urges the council to support formation of a civilian oversight board on police misconduct.<br><i>Photo by Dave Roberts</i>
Argentina Davila Luevano, an Antioch resident and representative of the League of United Latin American Citizens, urges the council to support formation of a civilian oversight board on police misconduct.
Photo by Dave Roberts
slideshow
Mayor Jim Davis led off Tuesday’s City Council meeting by saying, “I think it’s going to be an exciting year for all of us.” And then the mayor and council were confronted by more excitement than they probably cared for: an intense debate by residents on whether to form a civilian oversight board looking into misconduct by Antioch police officers.

Ironically, the very thing that oversight board proponents cited as the reason for needing it – lawsuits filed against the city alleging racial discrimination by police – resulted in the council members declining to even discuss it, let alone place it on the agenda for a vote.

Councilman Reggie Moore, who strongly argued in favor of the oversight board when it was first brought to the council’s attention in November, and Councilwoman Mary Rocha, who also indicated support for it, have both been silent since then when the issue has been raised by the public. The other council members have not said anything at all about it.

After 19 speakers spent an hour debating the issue only to be met with silence by the council, Councilwoman Martha Parsons asked City Attorney Lynn Tracy Nerland to explain their silence. Nerland said that the Brown Act prevents the council from discussing an item that is not on the agenda. “A majority of the council has chosen not to place the issue of a civilian oversight commission on the agenda because of litigation that has been filed against the city,” she added.

The council was in closed session before the meeting to discuss the status of a lawsuit against the city filed by five African-American women alleging racial discrimination by the police in attempting to remove them from the Section 8 subsidized housing program and to get them evicted by their landlords. A U.S. District Court judge is currently considering the women’s request to expand it to a class-action suit including African-Americans past, present and future in Antioch who have been or will be discriminated against by the police.

The police oversight board issue was first raised at the Nov. 10 council meeting by Antioch resident Angel Luevano, representing the League of United Latin American Citizens. He asked the council to adopt an ordinance forming the board, saying, “There have been a large amount of community complaints about police misconduct. These include allegations of police brutality, racial profiling.”

At the Dec. 8 council meeting a dozen residents spoke against the formation of an oversight board, arguing that it’s unnecessary, would hamper police protection, the city lacks the funds to staff it, and it would become political. The mother of a slain police officer said to the council, “I am begging you to not to let his sacrifice be in vain by hamstringing the police department by forming this proposed civilian police board.” Only three people spoke in favor of the board proposal.

But Tuesday’s meeting saw a strong show of support for the oversight board. Fourteen people spoke in favor of it, pointing out the cost to the city of fighting the numerous lawsuits, the need for a process to hear and respond to residents’ complaints about police harassment, and the benefit of regular open dialogue about public safety issues.

“We have an emergency situation on our hand – police misconduct or alleged police misconduct,” said Frederick Muhammad, who pointed out that the city and school board recently paid $750,000 to settle a racial discrimination lawsuit out of court. “There’s multiple lawsuits pending behind that one. We will be forced to continue to settle and settle and settle. Ultimately we will lose our city due to lawsuits.

“This is alarming. We are in a recession that hasn’t bottomed out yet. It will only get worse economically. We need to save every penny that we can. We will be forced into bankruptcy. We have to come together as a community. It takes constructive dialogue. A community police relations board is in order.”

Six people argued against forming the board, one of whom was Dick Augusta, a former CHP officer who was shot while making a routine traffic stop. “As a lifetime Antioch resident, I saw it go from a wonderful little town to a monster,” he said. “The crime rate is incredible. Public safety is on the minds of everybody. They (the police) put their life on the line every single time they go to work. A lot of them are killed on the job and thousands are injured. They are human and will make human mistakes occasionally. But they do hundreds of good things on a daily basis.

“But one time when there’s a little mistake or someone gets treated wrong or something, then the race card comes out. Race or nationality have no defense in a lawful arrest. It’s against the law for people to disobey a lawful order from a police officer. That’s necessary in society. We’ve got to get Antioch back to the nice old town it once was. I’m tired of this new group that’s coming in and wanting to cause trouble. They are sue-happy for every little thing, and often they are at fault.”
Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
Now I Get It
|
January 17, 2010
Thanks, Accountability! I had thought people were learning bad behavior elsewhere and bringing it here due to economic conditions and urban cultural demographic shifts. Thanks to the info you provided, though, it's clear that the mayor of Pleasant Hill might have been getting some favors for his punk kid. It explains so much...

anonymous
|
January 16, 2010
We can care less about Pleasant Hill. This is Antioch. We are dealing with lunatics like Frederick Muhammad, East County Democrats, NAACP, and LULAC who want to protect criminals and deny law abiding citizens our civil right to live in quiet safe neighborhoods.
Accountability!
|
January 16, 2010
For those of you who are employed in, visit, or pass through Pleasant Hill you may wish an oversight board existed there. (Here's an example of a dangerous offender who appeared to have been given special treatment by law-enforcement, special treatment which the Pleasant Hill Police Department has refused to address. If the Pleasant Hill City Manager or City Council have addressed and/or acted upon this issue citizens of Pleasant Hill are not aware of it).

The known, troubled son of the former Mayor of Pleasant Hill/retired Contra Costa County sheriff's deputy was arrested for attempted carjacking/att. robbery, false imprisonment, assault with a deadly weapon doing great bodily injury. He was identified/turned in to the PHPD by his own friend, and had been positively identified by the hospitalized victim as well. With blood on his clothing this young man was arrested, yet released from incarceration with no charges filed by the Contra Costa County D.A.. Less than 5 months later, while living with his parents in Pleasant Hill, and with an outstanding, no bail warrant for his arrest (parole violation) the former mayor/ret. sheriff deputy's son stabbed again. The PHPD arrested, then jailed an innocent young man with a concrete, substantiated alibi. Alibi witnesses included a sworn peace officer and his equally credible wife. For details of this particular travesty of justice visit our blog at JuryUninformed.blogspot.com If you truly wish to make a difference, speak up! HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE, or expect more of the same.
Go Away
|
January 15, 2010
The first writer is Kirbie Bell. How do I know? Because if you google her name you will quickly see that she cannot spell "Chief Hyde". This woman is clearly uneducated and spent most of her time having babies by different fathers rather than obtaining a education.

No one believes anything you have to say Kirbie so just give it up. You are a disgrace to the black community.

anonymous
|
January 15, 2010
NO MORE CHIFE HYDE HE HAS RIPED OUR CITY APART JUST AS HE DID IN DAVISE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!where not standing for the bull in 2010
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the discretion of thepress.net.